Social Networking Is A Popular Form Of Communicating With...

A Social Disaster Social networking is a popular form of communicating with friends around the corner and around the world. It has become the most popular form of communication, even above the phone and texting. For a lot of people social networking is a new concept and it can be hard to understand why so many kids or young adults have this new growing addiction for social sites. The easiest way to understand social networking is to think of it like high school. You had friends in school, and you knew quite a few people even if you weren t friends with all of them, but it s likely that you didn t know everyone. If you ever moved to a new school, or if you can imagine moving to a new school, you start out with no friends. After†¦show more content†¦Parents should educate themselves further before allowing their kids to have access to something that has the potential of being dangerous. Online sites are not only a problem while they are in use but the information they are sharing now may one da y come back and haunt them down the line. â€Å"Once data is stored online, it can be accessed from any Internet-connected computer† (Marshall). Adolescence should not be exposed to the social networking world in order to protect them from cyber bulling, strangers, health problems and from being overly exposed at too young of an age. Privacy is one of the major concerns when it comes to social networking sites. A lot of kids do not understand the dangers that can come from social networking sites. People do not really understand that once something is shared online, that information can be harmful if it seems to be inappropriate, â€Å"Though there is nothing inherently unethical about the use of social networking sites, publicly sharing unprofessional content or excessive personal information may be compromising for professionals† (Gilman 535). Users put a lot of their personal business on their sites for everyone to view. Even if they think it is harmless, the littlest information can take a bad turn. People are able to see exactly where you are and who you are with, people can even hack into someone’s account and begin to collect confidential information. Because social networks do not

The Greenhouse Effect On The Environment - 2037 Words

The greenhouse effect occurs when the major gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxide and water vapour which then will trap heat in the atmosphere therefore those gasses act as a thick layer outside the planet surrounding the whole planet to control the climate (REF). If we did not have this layer that surrounds the planet and keeps it warm, the temperature would drop and it would not be inhabitable for humans. (REF) Containing this heat causes heat waves, droughts, and climate changes which could change our way of living on this planet. There are different types of gasses in the atmosphere, some are natural and some are manmade gasses, all of which are contribute to the greenhouse effect. Natural emissions such as: Carbon†¦show more content†¦There are a lot of manmade gasses which have been released into the atmosphere which have added to the green house layers these gasses such as sulphur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons this results in global warming which means heat that would normally be escaping through the greenhouse layers remains trapped which then start to cause the temperature to rise. Increasing the greenhouse effect can lead to global warming and climate change which will change the way we live. Deforestation: There is a lot of manmade gasses and human activities that are causing global warming and climate change such as deforestation, this has many negative effects on the planet and there are a huge amount of reasons why. According to WWO (2016) â€Å"Humans have used forests for fuel for thousands of years, and 2.6 billion people today still use biomass—mainly wood and charcoal—for cooking†. The main reasons for deforestation would be for profit such as money or providing for one’s family also a lot of farmers are use acres of forests for agriculture as the human population increases dramatically by the second the need for more food is needed so the only way to compensate for this is to plant crops

Should this business update to Windows 2000 from W Essay Example For Students

Should this business update to Windows 2000 from W Essay indows 98 for its office PCsShould this business update to Windows 2000 from Windows 98 for its office PCs?In the business world today, computers and the software applications that run on them basically control an well-organized business. Every major company is equipped with a computer, or network that connects through different branches throughout the firm. To keep up with the fastest technology that dominates the market is to be a sensible buyer. A system can be outdated in a matter of two years time. Therefore, it is necessary for the business to update to Windows 2000 from Windows 98 for its office PCs. Windows 2000 is intended to the business world and others who are running large networks of computers. It has a lot of things going for it, but just because it has some advantages over Windows NT and Windows 98 doesnt mean everyone should try it. My purpose here is not to evaluate the software but to counsel caution before you undertake a major operating systems update. Even thoug h Microsoft did a good job testing thousands of business applications, there are always rough spots in a transition. In fact, Microsoft has dedicated several Web pages to upgrade issues. Once if you then decide to update, do it when you can devote time to the changeover. If you have multiple machines, make the change in stages running the old operating system during the transition. First of all, the first thing is to determine that Windows 2000 is compatible with your machines. According to Windows 2000s description, you need, at minimum, a PC with a 133-MHz Pentium-compatible CPU, 64 megabytes of RAM and one gigabyte of disk space. It is better with a faster CPU (300 MHz or better) and several gigabytes of disk space. A bit more memory would be nice too. Therefore, some small businesses would like to upgrade Windows 2000 but they are bound by their hardware. Actually, we can say that Microsoft has done a good job of ensuring that most business applications will work with Windows 2000. But before you take the plunge, be sure all the programs you depend on are compatible with it. Major applications such as accounting, word processing and database software probably will be OK, but some specialized programs, games and multimedia applications may not be compatible. If you are familiar with Windows 98, youll feel pretty comfortable with the new operating systems look and feel. Nevertheless, there is always something to learn. If employees will be using your new operating system, you may need to train before they are comfortable with it. I recommend that most small businesses wait before undertaking a wholesale upgrade. If you have multiple machines and time to experiment, consider upgrading a simple machine to see how it goes. If you find that all is well, you can upgrade your other machines. Bibliography:Work Cite:From Microsoft Business Advantage web site:http://www.microsoft.com/biz/features/archive/20000117.asphttp://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/smallbiz/whybuy/reasons.asphttp://www.microsoft.com/biz/guides/win2k/case_awningstar.asphttp://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/smallbiz/profile/plazagroup.asphttp://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/smallbiz/profile/onenw.aspFrom ZDNET web site:http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/reviews/0,6755,2426065,00.htmlhttp://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/reviews/0,6755,2426067,00.htmlhttp://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/reviews/0,6755,2426069,00.htmlhttp://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/stories/reviews/0,6755,2426071,00.htmlFrom CNN web site news:http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/02/23/intel.w2k.idg/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/02/22/win2k.apps.idg/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/02/17/windows.2000/index.html

The Carceral Foucaults Discipline and Punish Essay Example For Students

The Carceral Foucaults Discipline and Punish Essay The Carceral in Foucaults Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison, a book by Michel Foucault, first published in 1975, then later edited in English in 1977 still continues to rivet attention 35 years after it was written. It is evident to believe that it is still revolutionary in its findings. Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, sociologist and historian. The professor of history and systems of social thought at college de France, Foucault is widely recognised as a leading social theorist. Discipline and Punish continues to provide insights and suggested solutions that appear in the penal system. Foucaults point is to show how significantly the penal system changed in 80 years and details the history of the French penal system with the interpretation of historical events identifying the domination of human spirits. He argues, in the later part of the 18th century the focus of punishment began to shift from the body to the soul or mind of the offender to discipline them. We will write a custom essay on The Carceral Foucaults Discipline and Punish specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now He described discipline as a type of power. Prisons became more than just places where liberty was deprived. Furthermore, the closing section of the book is the main focus of my review and is entitled, simply, The carceral. He investigated the massive shift from corporal to carceral punishment. Foucault analysed, our persistent and reasoned need to normalise individuals, to punish and reform deviance within society through discipline. Foucault tries to account for universal and historical developments and the emergence of a disciplined society the carceral archipelago in which all of institutional life is characterised by surveillance and discipline and in which delinquent and abnormal behaviour are subjected to scientific investigation. Ultimately, Discipline and Punish is a call to arms, a predict for the future, and a study of the past all organised into one elegant text. The chapter opens with an explanation of a particular model French prison Mettray, possibly for young offenders. Foucault describes how this was more than just a prison which housed minors who had committed a crime and minors who had not committed a crime but were without normal family relations. He describes how Mettray and other institutions of social life such as the school, the family, the workshop, the army and the prison were interrelated by the development of similar disciplinary techniques and shared certain similar features. He described them as places in which ones action came under the direction of anothers will. At Mettray, the timetable stressed physical exercise, hard work, and the organised recording of results. The aim was to produce strong, skilled agricultural workers. The prison trained other professionals too, focusing on techniques of pure discipline, rather than science, although Psychology was to develop in that institution. He explains the disciplinary technique became a discipline which also had its school (Foucault, 1977: 295). Traditionally, the school has been understood as a limited, relatively self contained and independent institution. According to Foucault, embodied in it was a carceral continuum a diverse range of institutions given over to the surveillance for the training and the normalization of individuals. He explained Penitentiary rationality as the central part of the carceral system. Nevertheless, the point that Foucault emphasises throughout is that discipline works under surveillance upon ones actions and engages ones will to perform. He described this process of constant supervision benefited in the production of obedient and capable bodies. He believes it is this which not only helps in reforming criminals but also to the education of students, management of workers and training of modern army. In his eyes, Mettray represented the birth of a new kind of supervision. He described Mettray as the punitive model (Foucault, 1977: 296). Foucault believed that the discipline of individuals will be achieved through microphysics of regulation. Foucault argues that surveillance attempts to transform individuals through observation and discipline and individuals therefore start to internally control themselves. Surveillance was seen to hold the key to reform. .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .postImageUrl , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:hover , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:visited , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:active { border:0!important; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:active , .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07 .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc46b3631ca0ba611f5e04270cc607d07:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: English Literature Coursework Analysis EssayHe argued, this great carceral network reaches all the disciplinary mechanisms that function throughout society (Foucault, 1977: 298). Throughout the last part of Discipline and Punish Foucault suggests that a carceral continuum runs through modern society. He believed the mechanisms of discipline and power that control the prisoners life also control that of the citizen. Foucaults account of the development of the prison and the carceral system makes it clear that society has a carceral texture and is penetrated by the same mechanisms that function within the prison. Similarly, through its construction of delinquency, the prison helps to control and regulate class conflict and popular misconduct. Whereas, the carceral naturalizes the legal power to punish, as it legalizes the technical power to discipline (Foucault, 1977:303). For Foucault, an investigation of appearance of the prison in the early 18th century is actually a means of exploring the much wider and more contemporary themes of how domination is achieved and individuals are socially constructed in the modern world. Foucault related how the penal system with its outreaching arms affects society as a whole. He believed other governmental programs, such as welfare and new educational techniques, expanded from the penal system. He called this expansion of disciplinary control the carceral archipelago. It created a whole society of docile bodies submitting to the will of the state. He argued, we have seen that, in penal justice, the prison transformed the punitive procedure into a penitentiary technique; the carceral archipelago transported this technique from penal institutions to the entire social body (Foucault, 1977:298). Finally, it gives an increase to the theatrical suggestion which Foucault refuses to accept is that the prison is the symbol of our disciplinary society. This however, does not mean that society is like a prison and everybody in it is targeted, what he argues is that society, like prison and other institutions keeps individuals under surveillance in order to keep peace and the birth of the prison which Foucault describes is in fact the progress of contemporary society itself. Foucault argues, classicists such as Beccaria saw retribution as a process for requalifying individuals as juridical subjects whereas Foucault believes that law breakers have placed themselves outside the society by committing an offence but the penal process should aim at returning them back as law abiding citizens (Cavadino Dignan, 2002: 45). He sees the carceral as the answer because here he believes the offender is not outside the law and society. In Foucaults words, the carceral with its far reaching networks, allows the recruitment of major delinquents and transforms their lives into disciplinary careers (Foucault, 1977:300). Within sociology, the work of Michel Foucault has completed a different understanding of power and discipline compared to analysis deriving from Weberian and Marxist theory. For Foucault the modern prison, with its mechanisms of total surveillance, represented a new form of knowledge and power. For Marx, the class struggle was the main problem in society as he believes the rich (bourgeoisie) get richer and the poor (proletariat) get poorer. Similarly, according to Foucault the ruling class used criminality as a way of preventing confrontations that could lead to revolution. He believed the ruling class used the law to diminish the power of these uprisings and the dominant class used the delinquent class as a means of profiting themselves (Smart, 1983).